Quick Tip: Working With Multiple Power BI Subscriptions/Accounts

As a consultant I frequently work with customers who want to add me to their Power BI tenant so I can publish reports, monitor data refresh and so on. However, this means I end up with many different Microsoft “Work or School” accounts, one for each customer, and signing in and out of each one can be a real pain. I use Chrome as my main browser so instead I create one profile in Chrome for each customer – it makes it very easy to switch between Power BI accounts without having to sign in and out.

For more details, see the Google documentation here:


…and here’s the blog post by James Callaghan on using this feature with multiple Office 365 subscriptions that I got the idea from:


It looks like you can do something similar with other browsers too.

SSAS 2016 Locking Improvements

I first became aware of the server-wide lock taken out by SSAS when processing finishes – and the issues that this can cause – from this blog post by Andrew Calvett back in 2009. More information on how locking works in SSAS can be found in chapter 26 of “Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Analysis Services Unleashed”, while the most comprehensive discussion of this topic can be found in this post by Jason Howell:

Over the years I’ve worked with several customers who have run into locking problems as a result of users querying while processing or synchronisation are taking place, so as a result I was interested to read the following paragraph in the white paper on “Automated Partition Management For Analysis Services Tabular Models” that was published a few months ago:

Note that commit operations have been optimized considerably for tabular models in SQL Server 2016. This has caused noticeable improvements in locking and blocking for some customers with near-real time processing requirements. Database write-commit locks are required to safely complete tasks such as merging pending changes, persisting files to disk, clearing some cached state, deletion of old files, etc. In previous versions of Analysis Services, a server-level write commit lock was taken while most of these tasks were performed. With SQL Server 2016, the server-level locks are far more limited; they are only taken while producing the delta of transaction updates, and are then immediately released.

This is very good news, and in fact the improvements apply to SSAS Multidimensional 2016 as well as SSAS Tabular 2016. The ever-helpful Akshai Mirchandani of the dev team has given me more details on the changes, so here’s a summary of what happens during a commit operation and what’s new in SSAS 2016:

  • First of all, a database read-commit lock is taken to analyse all the pending changes.
  • Next a database write-commit lock is taken so that the transaction can be committed safely. This is the lock that can be blocked by long-running queries, and this is where the ForceCommitTimeout property comes into play with the result that these long-running queries may get cancelled.
  • This lock is held while the pending changes are merged together.
  • At this point SSAS is ready to do the commit, and where it takes a server-level write-commit lock. This is also the point where the improvements in SSAS 2016 have been made.
    • In previous versions SSAS would update the master.vmp file in place and hold the server-level write-commit lock while that happens and while some other, potentially time-consuming things like clearing cached state and deleting all the old files take place. This could in some cases result in the server-level write-commit lock being held for an extended period.
    • Instead in SSAS 2016 a delta of all the transaction updates are written to a .txn file, and after that the server commit lock is released. The time-consuming tasks mentioned in the previous bullet still take place but after the server-level write-commit lock has been released. This means the server-level write-commit lock is now held for a very short amount of time, and what’s more that amount of time is quite consistent.
  • Finally, all remaining locks such as the database write-commit lock are released.

I haven’t had a chance to test these changes in a production system yet but it sounds like anyone that needs to process or synchronise regularly throughout the day will benefit from upgrading to SSAS 2016.

Thoughts On Visio And How It Could Integrate With Power BI

The recent release of Visio Online (which means most people with an Office 365 subscription can now see Visio diagrams in the browser) and updates for Visio Pro for Office 365 (the desktop version of Visio, needed for creating diagrams, available on subscription but annoyingly not included in any of the Office 365 Enterprise plans) made me wonder if there’s anything new for BI pros in the latest version of Visio. This is a subject I come back to every few years – the last time was in back in 2013 – but I’m still a bit disappointed by some aspects of Visio when it comes to working with data even though there’s a massive amount of potential there.

To recap, there are actually two features of Visio that are interesting for BI purposes. First, you can import data into Visio and then link rows of data to shapes in your diagram (see here for a basic intro; this presentation has a lot more detail and is a must-read) to create data-linked diagrams; if your data source is an Excel workbook stored in SharePoint Online/OneDrive for Business or a SharePoint Online list then you can even refresh the data in Visio Online in the browser. While it doesn’t do exactly the same thing, the fact that the Synoptic Panel custom visual for Power BI is so popular shows that people really like the idea of seeing their data visualised in diagram form. If you know what you’re doing, you can do some really amazing stuff with Visio data-linked diagrams: not just change shape colours but also their formatting, geometry, size and more.

Secondly there are Pivot Diagrams, the Visio equivalent of Excel’s PivotTables. This blog post by David Parker is a really good guide to what they can do; like PivotTables they can even be linked direct to SSAS. The enduring popularity of the old Proclarity Decomposition Tree and the fact that so many people want something similar to be added to Power BI shows the appeal that this way of analysing data has for BI pros and Visio Pivot Diagrams are much more powerful than any custom visual the Power BI team could hope to develop.

So where does Visio fall short and what could be done about it? Here are some thoughts:

  • The data import options are limited, both in terms of where you can get data from and what you can do with it after that. These are all problems that Excel has solved in recent years with Power Pivot and Power Query, so why not borrow what Excel have implemented? Power Query/Get & Transform functionality for data loading and transformation, and a Visio Data Model (like the Excel Data Model/Power Pivot) would solve all these problems at a stroke and mean that anyone who had experience with Excel or Power BI would be able to move over to using Visio for BI easily.
  • Publishing to Office 365 is all well and good, but publishing to Power BI would also be useful. This might involve:
    • The ability to publish Visio diagrams to Power BI in the same way we can publish Excel workbooks to Power BI today.
    • A Visio equivalent to “Analyze in Excel” so you could create Pivot Diagrams connected to Power BI datasets. This should be straightforward to implement because Pivot Diagrams already work with SSAS, so all you would need to do is fire the same MDX at Power BI.
    • Once published, the ability to pin Visio diagrams to a Power BI dashboard.
    • The ability to schedule data refresh in the same way you can today with Power BI datasets and Excel workbooks.
  • The separate and relatively pricey ($13USD per month) subscription needed for Visio on the desktop suggests that Microsoft now thinks of it as a niche product, not something that even a top-of-the-range Office 365 E5 subscriber gets by default. I guess they’re allowed to make that assumption but it will be very hard for a BI pro to justify that expense for a product that isn’t essential for their job. Adding Visio into the top Office 365 SKUs would expose it to a much wider audience including BI pros. Incidentally the same argument can be made about Visio’s newly re-acquired ability to create diagrams from relational databases: it looks nice, but how many DBAs will be able to justify the cost of a subscription just for it?

In summary, while I know that I’m guilty of looking at Visio from a BI pro point of view and that data visualisation isn’t necessarily Visio’s primary purpose, I do think both Visio and Power BI could both benefit a lot from closer integration just as Excel and Power BI have done in recent years. With a bit of investment from both teams we could have another killer feature added to Power BI, one that none of Microsoft’s competitors could begin to match.

Power Query/Get & Transform: The Future Of Data Loading In Excel

Last week, Dominic Petri shared a link on Twitter that contained some important news from Microsoft: as of the March release of the Office 365 click-to-run version of Excel 2016, the old methods of loading data into Excel will be replaced by the newer “Get & Transform” functionality that is better known as Power Query. All the details are here:


Up to now Excel 2016 users have had to deal with a rather confusing compromise whereby the older data loading functionality existed side-by-side with the new “Get & Transform” functionality on the Data tab of the ribbon. From the March update onwards though the Data tab will look like this:

Get & Transform options on the Data tab

There are also several other cool new features being introduced, such as the ability to export Power Query queries to .odc files so they can be shared between workbooks, and new UI for managing connections and queries. You’ll still be able to get the old data loading functionality back via the Options dialog if you want.

If you’re a regular reader of this blog you’ll know that I’m a massive fan of Power Query, so naturally I’m really happy to see this happen. I believe it’s a big step forward for Excel in terms of its BI and reporting capabilities and the fact that this functionality is almost identical to the data loading functionality in Power BI means that Microsoft’s overall BI story becomes even more compelling: the skills you learn in Excel are transferable to Power BI and vice versa. On the other hand I can guess this is going to cause confusion for some users – similar to what happened when the ribbon first appeared in Office 2007 – but I don’t think this can be avoided. Ultimately the benefits will outweigh any disruption caused as users have to learn the new way of doing things.

Exporting Your Queries’ M Code From Power Query And Power BI Using Copy/Paste

Two years ago I blogged about a method to export all the M code for all of your queries in Power Query using the Send A Frown button – useful if you need the code for documentation purposes. This trick doesn’t work with Power BI Desktop, unfortunately, but the good news is that there’s a better way to do this now in Power Query and Power BI Desktop using copy/paste. It’s pretty simple really: when you copy a query from the Power Query or Power BI Desktop Query Editor you can not only paste the query to another Query Editor (pasting from Power Query to Power BI and vice versa works too) but you can also paste the query to a text editor like Notepad and get the M code for the query. What’s more, you can also select more than one query in the Query Editor and when you paste you get all the code for all of the selected queries:


Remember that because the properties of each step in a query become comments in your M code, they get copied too.

Thanks to VossF for telling me about this on this thread.

Handling Missing Members In The CubeSet() Function With Power Pivot

Last week I received an email from a reader asking how to handle missing members in MDX used in the Excel CubeSet() function. My first thought was that this could be solved easily with the MDXMissingMemberMode connection string property but it turns out this can’t be used with Power Pivot in Excel 2013/6 because you can’t edit the connection string back to the Excel Data Model:


Instead, you have no choice but to handle this in MDX.

Here’s an illustration of the problem. Imagine you have the following table of data on your Excel worksheet:


With this table added to the Excel Data Model, you could write the following Excel formula using CubeSet():



In the screenshot above the CubeSet() formula is used in H3, while in H4 there’s a formula using CubeSetCount() that shows the set contains three members.

If the source data is updated so that the row for Pears is deleted like so:


Then the CubeSet() formula returns an error because the member Pears no longer exists:


How can this be avoided? If what you actually wanted was all of the Products, whatever they were, the best thing to do is to use the MDX Members function like so:


[I talk about the Members function in this post in my series of posts on MDX for Power Pivot users]

This formula does not return an error and you can see that the CubeSetCount() formula below shows the set only contains two members now:


If you do need to refer to individual members then the MDX you need is more complicated:



This MDX uses the StrToMember() function to interpret the contents of a string as an MDX expression returning a member; if this expression returns an error then it is trapped by the IsError() function and an empty set is returned.

This isn’t particularly pretty, though, and ideally the MDXMissingMemberMode connection string property would be set to Ignore in the Excel Data Model connection string property.

Finding Out (Approximately) How Long A Calculation Contributes To The Duration Of An MDX Query

In my last two blog posts (see here and here) I showed how to use the Calculation Evaluation and Calculation Evaluation Detailed Information trace events to work out which MDX calculations are evaluated when a query runs in Analysis Services Multidimensional. That’s very useful, but wouldn’t it be great if you could work out how long any single calculation contributes to the overall duration of a query? If you could, it would make performance tuning MDX calculations much easier.

While you can’t get an exact amount of time taken for each calculation, the good news is that it is possible to get a duration rounded to the next second if your calculation is evaluated in bulk mode.

Take a look at the following query:



[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]=0,


([Measures].[Internet Sales Amount], 

[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount] * 2

HEAD([Customer].[Customer].[Customer].MEMBERS, 200)
ON 0,
ON 1
[Adventure Works]

This query contains five calculated measures: the first four in the WITH clause, DAYRANK, HADSALE, LASTSALERANK and LASTSALE, are based on my approach for finding the last ever non-empty value for a measure across time; the final measure, SIMPLECALC, is as the name suggests a very simple calculation. On my laptop this query takes around 13 seconds to run on my laptop, on a warm Storage Engine cache. Why does it take so long? It’s clearly the calculations that are the problem, but which one(s)?

Luckily all of the calculations in this query are evaluated in bulk mode so, as I discussed in my last two posts, there is an event raised with:

Event Class = Calculation Evaluation Detailed Information

Event Subclass = 107 – RunEvalNode Finished Calculating Item

…for each of the calculations when they are evaluated. Unfortunately the Duration column for this event always shows 0, but there is a way to see approximately how long the calculation took by comparing the Start Time and Current Time columns in the trace.

The 107 – RunEvalNode event for the measure SIMPLECALC shows the same time for the Start Time and Current Time columns:


This indicates that the SIMPLECALC calculation is evaluated in under a second.

However, sequence of 107 – RunEvalNode events for the LASTSALE calculation shows something different:


There’s a gap of 7 seconds between the StartTime and the CurrentTime, and this indicates that the calculation took 7 seconds to evaluate. It’s a bit frustrating that there isn’t a way to get a more accurate duration here, but it’s still very clear which calculation is taking all the time. Even though the time for calculating LASTSALE includes the time taken for calculating LASTSALERANK, HADSALE and DAYRANK (all of which need to be calculated in order to calculation LASTSALE), the equivalent rows in the trace for these other calculations show they took under a second each. It’s only the logic inside LASTSALE itself that is slow – so that’s where any tuning needs to take place. Indeed, modifying the query to return LASTSALERANK instead of LASTSALE makes the query faster by around 6 seconds, supporting this conclusion.

If you’re curious about what the other 6 seconds of the query execution time is taken up by, it seems like it’s serialisation of the results – something I blogged about here. The query returns a cellset with 400*1190=476000 cells in, and SSAS doesn’t cope well with queries that return a large amount of data.